Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Masur vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Masur vs Miralles analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Masur vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Masur 1 - 2 Miralles
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Masur has won 51.96% of points on his second serve, while Miralles has won 48.07%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Masur, in recent form, has won 51.66% of his opponent's second serve points, while Miralles has won 50.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.03% and 31.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Masur has saved 64.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Miralles has saved 55.61% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Masur has won 66.2% of matches played (W/L 47/ 24), with Miralles winning 35.42% (W/L 17/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Masur has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 134/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Miralles has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 291/ 170), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 35/ 48).
- Player level: In the last year, Masur has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 74.36% of matches (W/L 29/ 10), where as Miralles has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.71% of matches (W/L 11/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Masur winning 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Masur winning 4 and Miralles winning 4. The last match between Masur and Miralles was at the Ludwigshafen Challenger, 02-07-2019, Second, Clay with Bernabe Zapata Miralles getting the victory 0-6 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:19:13.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Masur and Miralles have played a deciding set 2 times, with Masur winning 0 times and Miralles 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Masur winning 1, and Miralles 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Masur has played against opponents with an average rank of 198.59 while Miralles has played against players with an average rank of 201.15.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Masur has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Miralles has won 11% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Masur has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Miralles has converted 42.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
295
Rank
176
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
1
Indoor1
0
Grass0
219
Rank
37
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
58% (384-279)
Career Total W/L
57% (401-300)
78% (32-9)
YTD W/L
39% (11-17)
$151,200
Career Prize Money
$1,212,255
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Masur | Bernabe Zapata Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 31 | 36 |
| Aces (Total) | 28 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:19:13 | 1:19:13 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (125/215) | 63% (119/189) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (93/125) | 70% (83/119) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 41% (37/90) | 54% (38/70) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 41% (9/22) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (68/189) | 40% (85/215) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-6 6-1 6-0 |
Stats 
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Masur
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Masur
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
5
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Masur | Bernabe Zapata Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 78% (32/9) | 39% (11/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 74% (70/25) | 42% (25/35) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (538/401) | 46% (252/298) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 45% (10/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 85% (28/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.48 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 222 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 106 | 44 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:19 | 1:33:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 178 | 231.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1858/2853) | 69% (1269/1831) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (1406/1858) | 59% (755/1269) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (518/995) | 48% (269/562) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (131/296) | 43% (68/158) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (1180/2978) | 39% (651/1658) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 20% (2/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 82% (9/2) | 67% (8/4) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (23/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 78% (32/41) | 38% (9/24) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (12/18) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 54% (7/13) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (34/30) | 77% (13/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 12% (34/4) | 23% (13/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (7/2) | 7% (15/1) |
Daniel Masur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Timofey Skatov
Player
Daniel Masur
49%
(
41 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
1
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
6
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Lucas Gerch
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Vilius Gaubas
57%
(
44 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
49 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
99)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
99
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Cox
Player
Daniel Masur
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ewen Lumsden
Player
Daniel Masur
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
76%
(
84 of
111)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
55 of
84)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
111)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Daniel Cox
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Daniel Masur
68%
(
65 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
93)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Masur
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
70 of
111)
8
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
54 of
70)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Masur
Player
Theo Papamalamis
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
30%
(
3 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
65%
(
15 of
23)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
28
Total Points Won
15
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
52%
(
37 of
71)
1st Serve %
84%
(
49 of
58)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Manuel Guinard
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
52%
(
56 of
107)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
74)
47%
(
24 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
40 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
51 of
112)
118
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Masur Vs Miralles Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
